FORECASTING AND OPTIMIZATION OF CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT OPERATION UNDER CONDITIONS OF FUZZY INFORMATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37943/19ICLE1807Keywords:
catalytic cracing, nonlinear regression, fuzzy logic, optimization, forecasting, technological processes, oil refiningAbstract
This paper discusses the application of nonlinear regression to forecast and optimize the operation of catalytic cracking units under conditions of fuzzy information. Catalytic cracking is a crucial process in oil refining that produces high-quality gasoline and other light hydrocarbon products. However, the complexity of the process and the uncertainty of initial data complicate the modeling and optimization of plant operations. To address this issue, a nonlinear regression method is proposed that accommodates the fuzziness of input and output parameters described by linguistic variables. The methodology includes the collection and formalization of expert knowledge, the construction of fuzzy models, and their integration into the process control system. Forecasting is performed by creating regression models that describe the relationships between operational parameters and product quality characteristics. The paper presents a procedure for developing and applying nonlinear regression models, describes algorithms for synthesizing linguistic models, and provides examples of their use to optimize the operation of catalytic cracking units. The modeling results demonstrate the high adequacy and accuracy of the proposed method, as well as its advantages over traditional approaches in conditions of uncertainty and data scarcity. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the development and testing of advanced nonlinear regression models adapted for analyzing and optimizing catalytic cracking processes based on fuzzy data. These methods take into account the specificity and uncertainty of process data, improving the accuracy and reliability of forecasts, which facilitates more effective management of production processes in the petrochemical industry. The main reason for conducting this study is the need to improve the control of oil refining processes, particularly catalytic cracking, which plays an important role in producing high-quality gasoline. The complexity of this process and the presence of fuzzy information caused by fuzzy initial data require the development of new modeling and optimization methods.
Existing traditional models based on deterministic methods are often insufficient under uncertainty. This leads to a decrease in the accuracy of process control, which can negatively affect the quality of the final product and production efficiency. The use of nonlinear regression in combination with fuzzy logic is a more flexible and adaptive approach that allows you to take into account the fuzziness and uncertainty of data and use expert knowledge to build models that match the actual operating conditions of the units. Thus, this study aims to solve the key problems associated with data uncertainty and the complexity of the catalytic cracking process, which will improve the accuracy of forecasting and optimization of the units. The main contribution is creating a model that uses nonlinear regression methods in combination with fuzzy logic. This allows uncertainty in input data (such as reactor temperature or pressure) to be effectively considered and processed to improve gasoline and other product yield forecasts. It is shown that using nonlinear regression combined with fuzzy logic significantly improves the management of technological processes, increases the output and quality of products, and reduces production costs. The conclusion of the paper discusses the prospects for further development of the methodology and its application to solve similar tasks in other areas of chemical technology.
References
Han, I.-S.; Chung, C.-B. (2022). Dynamic modeling and simulation of a fluidized catalytic cracking process. Part II: Property estimation and simulation. Chem. Eng. Sci., 56, 1973–1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00494-2
Emberru, R.E.; Patel, R.; Mujtaba, I.M.; John, Y.M. A Review of Catalyst Modification and Process Factors in the Production of Light Olefins from Direct Crude Oil Catalytic Cracking. Sci 2024, 6, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci6010011
Palos, R., Rodríguez, E., Gutiérrez, A., Bilbao, J., & Arandes, J. M. (2022). Kinetic modeling for the catalytic cracking of tires pyrolysis oil. Fuel, 309, 122055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122055
Orazbayev, B.B.; Shangitova, Z.Y.; Orazbayeva, K.N.; Serimbetov, B.A.; Shagayeva, A.B. (2020) Studying the Dependence of the Performance Efficiency of a Claus Reactor on Technological Factors with the Quality Evaluation of Sulfur on the Basis of Fuzzy Information. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 54, 1235–1241.
Taşkin, H., Kubat, C., Uygun, Ö., & Arslankaya, S. (2006). FUZZYFCC: Fuzzy logic control of a fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) to improve dynamic performance. Computers & chemical engineering, 30(5), 850-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.12.016
Precup, R. E., Nguyen, A. T., & Blažič, S. (2024). A survey on fuzzy control for mechatronics applications. International Journal of Systems Science, 55(4), 771-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2023.2293486
He, G., Zhou, C., Luo, T., Zhou, L., Dai, Y., Dang, Y., & Ji, X. (2020). Online optimization of Fluid Catalytic Cracking process via a Hybrid model based on Simplified structure-Oriented Lumping and case-based reasoning. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 60(1), 412-424. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/ra/d1ra03228c
Beatriz Flamia Azevedo, Ana Maria A. C. Rocha, Ana I. Pereira (2024) Hybrid approaches to optimization and machine learning methods: a systematic literature review. Machine Learning., 113:4055–4097
Orazbayev B.B, Kenzhebayeva T.S., Orazbayeva K.N. (2023). B. Orazbayev, B.; S. Kenzhebayeva, T.; and N. Orazbayeva, K. (2019) "Development of Mathematical Models and Modelling of Chemical Technological Systems using Fuzzy-Output Systems," Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences: Vol. 13: Iss. 4, Article 17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/amis/130417
Yang, F., Xu, M., Lei, W., & Lv, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence methods applied to catalytic cracking processes. Big Data Mining and Analytics, 6(3), 361-380.
Santander, O., Kuppuraj, V., Harrison, C. A., & Baldea, M. (2023). Deep learning model predictive control frameworks: Application to a fluid catalytic cracker–fractionator process. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 62(27), 10587-10600. 10.1109/ICSTCC55426.2022.9931761
Orazbayev, B., Kozhakhmetova, D., Wójtowicz, R., & Krawczyk, J. (2020). Modeling of catalytic cracking in the gasoline production installation with a fuzzy environment. Energies, 13(18), 4736. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184736
Bochkarev, V. V., & Troyan, A. A. (2017). Optimization of Chemical Technological Processes. Publishing House Yurayt: Krakow, Poland, 337.
Josiah, P.N.; Otaraku, I.J.; Evbuomwan, B.O. Servo and Regulatory Response of an Industrial Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Unit under Fuzzy Logic Supervisory Control. Eng. Technol. J. 2023, 41, 1139–1151.
Orazbayev, B., Boranbayeva, N., Makhatova, V., Rzayeva, L., Ospanov, Y., Kurmashev, I., & Kurmangaziyeva, L. (2024). Development and Synthesis of Linguistic Models for Catalytic Cracking Unit in a Fuzzy Environment. Processes, 12(8), 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12081543
Xie, Y.; Zhang, Y.; He, L.; Jia, C.Q.; Yao, Q.; Sun, M.; Ma, X. (2020) Anti-deactivation of zeolite catalysts for residue fluid catalytic cracking. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 657, 119159.
Hasan Sildir, Yaman Arkun, Ummuhan Canan, Serdar Celebi, Utku Karani (2015) Dynamic modeling and optimization of an industrial fluid catalytic cracker. Journal of Process Control 31, 30-44
Elshishini, S.S.; Elnashaie, E.H. (2018) Digital simulation of industrial fluid catalytic cracking units: Bifurcation and its implications. Chem. Eng. Sci., 45, 553–559.
Zimmermann, H.-J. Fuzzy Set Theory - And Its Applications, 5th ed.; Springer Science + Business Media, LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; p. 525
Chen, Z.; Lyu, W.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; Xu, C.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, L. (2023) A molecular kinetic model incorporating catalyst acidity for hydrocarbon catalytic cracking. AIChE J., 69, 145–158.
Fan Yang, Chaonan Dai, Jianquan Tang, Jin Xuan, Jun Cao (2020) A hybrid deep learning and mechanistic kinetics model for the prediction of fluid catalytic cracking performance. Chemical Engineering Research and Design., 155, 202-210.
Adeola Grace Olugbenga, Olujinmi Julius Oluwaseyi (2023) Analysis of the Process Parameter in Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit for a Refining and Petrochemical Company in Nigeria. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science., 13, 65-78.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Articles are open access under the Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish a manuscript in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and transfer to the journal the right of first publication under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory link to the the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors have the right to conclude independent additional agreements that relate to the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic repository of the institution or publish as part of a monograph), providing the link to the first publication of the work in this journal.
- Other terms stated in the Copyright Agreement.