AN ANALYSIS OF THE HETEROGENEOUS IOT DEVICE NETWORK INTERACTION IN A CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37943/16ENNA6243

Keywords:

internet of things, heterogeneous , network interaction , cyber-physical system , messaging protocols , data transferring standards

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of existing technologies regarding Internet of Things (IoT) device interaction in a heterogeneous network. Since each smart home appliance can be controlled by a customer who aims to find a cost-effective and easy-to-connect product for their own connected home, there are certain functional limitations for devices from distinct manufacturers that may decrease the intention to merge them all into a single network. A variety of proprietary protocols and communication standards embedded by vendors make their products unable to interact with other vendor devices if the connection standard used is not identical. Also, an IoT product design refers to its own functionality, mainly excluding the possibility of integration into other existing infrastructure. As IoT equipment emerges on the market, the complexity of its connection to a heterogeneous network corresponds to the firmware and the standard unification according to modern demands. It means that potential users might face the necessity of overcoming these issues to achieve high performance in terms of network interoperability. In general, an IoT gateway operating as a middleware might have the potential to enable a network with distinct communication models to operate without failure or data loss. This task requires the received data to be converted into the format in which the data is intended. This paper includes a comparative analysis of existing IoT device interaction standards, connection protocols, and data transfer technologies, evaluating their features for an effective adoption of the proposed network architecture, which can be used to improve the interoperability of heterogeneous IoT devices.

References

Tao, F., Qi, Q., Wang, L., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twins and cyber–physical systems toward smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: Correlation and comparison. Engineering, 5(4), 653-661.

Akbarzadeh, A., & Katsikas, S. (2020). Identifying critical components in large scale cyber physical systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops, 230-236.

Addeen, H. H., Xiao, Y., Li, J., & Guizani, M. (2021). A survey of cyber-physical attacks and detection methods in smart water distribution systems. IEEE Access, 9, 99905-99921.

Chui, K. T., Gupta, B. B., Liu, J., Arya, V., Nedjah, N., Almomani, A., & Chaurasia, P. (2023). A Survey of Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems: Standards, Algorithms, Applications, Security, Challenges, and Future Directions. Information, 14(7), 388.

Pivoto, D. G., de Almeida, L. F., da Rosa Righi, R., Rodrigues, J. J., Lugli, A. B., & Alberti, A. M. (2021). Cyber-physical systems architectures for industrial internet of things applications in Industry 4.0: A literature review. Journal of manufacturing systems, 58, 176-192.

Franco, J., Aris, A., Canberk, B., & Uluagac, A. S. (2021). A survey of honeypots and honeynets for internet of things, industrial internet of things, and cyber-physical systems. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(4), 2351-2383.

Mohanta, B. K., Dehury, M. K., Al Sukhni, B., & Mohapatra, N. (2022). Cyber physical system: Security challenges in internet of things system. 2022 Sixth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), 117-122.

Yaacoub, J. P. A., Salman, O., Noura, H. N., Kaaniche, N., Chehab, A., & Malli, M. (2020). Cyber-physical systems security: Limitations, issues and future trends. Microprocessors and microsystems, 77, 103201.

Yeboah-Ofori, A., Abdulai, J., & Katsriku, F. (2019). Cybercrime and risks for cyber physical systems. International Journal of Cyber-Security and Digital Forensics (IJCSDF), 8(1), 43-57.

Sinha, S. (2023). State of IoT 2023: Number of connected IoT devices growing 16% to 16.7 billion globally. IoT Analytics. https://iot-analytics.com/number-connected-iot-devices/

2413-2019 - IEEE Standard for an Architectural Framework for the Internet of Things (IoT). (2020). IEEE Standard. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9032420

TOSCA Version 2.0. Edited by Chris Lauwers and Calin Curescu. (2023). https://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/TOSCA/v2.0/TOSCA-v2.0.html

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Cards and security devices for personal identification (ISO 14443-1:2018). https://www.iso.org/standard/73596.html

Beniwal, G., & Singhrova, A. (2022). A systematic literature review on IoT gateways. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(10), 9541-9563.

Du, J., Gao, C., & Feng, T. (2023). Formal Safety Assessment and Improvement of DDS Protocol for Industrial Data Distribution Service. Future Internet, 15(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15010024

Malik, M.I, McAteer, I.N., Hannay, P., Syed, N.F., & Zubair, B. (2018). XMPP architecture and security challenges in an IoT ecosystem. Proceedings of the 16th Australian Information Security Management Conference, 62-73.

Coetzee, L., Oosthuizen, D., & Mkhize, B. (2018). An analysis of CoAP as transport in an Internet of Things environment. 2018 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa), 1-7.

Mishra, B., & Kertesz, A. (2020). The use of MQTT in M2M and IoT systems: A survey. IEEE Access, 8, 201071-201086.

Elsadek, W. F., & Mikhail, M. N. (2018). SOAP: SDN overlay across providers for IoT cognition services. 2018 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Computer Engineering (ITCE), 63-70.

Bansal, S., & Kumar, D. (2020). IoT ecosystem: A survey on devices, gateways, operating systems, middleware and communication. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 27, 340-364.

Diyan, M., Nathali Silva, B., Han, J., Cao, Z., & Han, K. (2022). Intelligent Internet of Things gateway supporting heterogeneous energy data management and processing. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 33(2), e3919.

Ramírez, P. L. G., Taha, M., Lloret, J., & Tomás, J. (2019). An intelligent algorithm for resource sharing and self-management of wireless-IoT-gateway. IEEE Access, 8, 3159-3170.

Aloul, F., Zualkernan, I., Shapsough, S., & Towheed, M. (2020). A monitoring and control gateway for iot edge devices in smart home. In 2020 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), 696-701.

Lazidis, A., Tsakos, K., & Petrakis, E. G. (2022). Publish–Subscribe approaches for the IoT and the cloud: Functional and performance evaluation of open-source systems. Internet of Things, 19, 100538.

Arif, N. H., & Surantha, N. (2020). IoT Cloud Platform Based on Asynchronous Processing for Reliable Multi-user Health Monitoring. In Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS-2019), 317-330.

Gadekar, P. R., Verma, A. R., & Dhotre, V. A. (2020). Multicast routing protocols for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Techno-Societal 2018: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Societal Applications-Volume 2, 99-106.

Khalil, K., Elgazzar, K., Seliem, M., & Bayoumi, M. (2020). Resource discovery techniques in the internet of things: a review. Internet of Things, 12, 100293.

Bharti, M., Kumar, R., Saxena, S., & Jindal, H. (2020). Optimal resource selection framework for Internet-of-Things. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 86, 106693.

Kang, B., & Choo, H. (2018). An experimental study of a reliable IoT gateway. ICT Express, 4(3), 130-133.

Castellanos, W., Macias, J., Pinilla, H., & Alvarado, J. D. (2021). Internet of things: a multiprotocol gateway as solution of the interoperability problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.00098.

Koolen, C. (2023). Interoperability in IoT Ecosystems. SSRN, 4474625.

Vila, M., Sancho, M. R., Teniente, E., & Vilajosana, X. (2023). Critical infrastructure awareness based on IoT context data. Internet of Things, 23, 100855.

Roy, S. K., Misra, S., & Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2019). SensPnP: Seamless integration of heterogeneous sensors with IoT devices. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 65(2), 205-214.

Gavrila, C., Popescu, V., Fadda, M., Anedda, M., & Murroni, M. (2020). On the suitability of HbbTV for unified smart home experience. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 67(1), 253-262.

Timalsina, U., & Wang, A. (2019). Incentivizing Services Sharing in IoT with OSGi and HashGraph. 2nd International Conference on Data Intelligence and Security (ICDIS), 48-52.

Tsakalidis, S., Tsoulos, G., Kontaxis, D., & Athanasiadou, G. (2023). Design and Implementation of a Versatile openHab IoT Testbed with a Variety of Wireless Interfaces and Sensors. Telecom, 4(3), 597–610.

Gunge, V. S., & Yalagi, P. S. (2016). Smart home automation: a literature review. International Journal of Computer Applications, 975(8887-8891).

Sun, P. (2018, March). Multi-Mode Iot Gateway Design and Implemention. 2018 International Conference on Mechanical, Electronic, Control and Automation Engineering.

Azzedin, F., Mohammed, S., Ghaleb, M., Yazdani, J., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Systematic partitioning and labeling XML subtrees for efficient processing of XML queries in IoT environments. IEEE Access, 8, 61817-61833.

Andročec, D., Tomaš, B., & Kišasondi, T. (2017). Interoperability and lightweight security for simple IoT devices. 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 1285-1291.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-14

How to Cite

Nurgaliyev, K., Tokhmetov, A., & Tanchenko, L. (2023). AN ANALYSIS OF THE HETEROGENEOUS IOT DEVICE NETWORK INTERACTION IN A CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEM. Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, 16(16). https://doi.org/10.37943/16ENNA6243

Issue

Section

Articles
betpas