EVALUATING A MOBILE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ ENVIRONMENTAL COMPETENCIES: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37943/MRCC6435%20

Keywords:

environmental competencies; environmental education; mobile learning; mobile application; sustainable development; digital learning; higher education.

Abstract

The integration of digital technologies into environmental education creates opportunities to link theoretical knowledge with practical activities and environmentally responsible behavior. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the Green IQ mobile app as a supplementary educational tool for fostering environmental competencies among students and to determine whether its integration into traditional environmental education is associated with an increase in students’ environmental competencies. The study involved a quantitative quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test analysis in a control group. Sixty first-year students participated in the study. Participants were divided into an experimental group (n = 29) and a control group (n = 31). Both groups received comparable environmental education through lectures, training sessions, and practical assignments, while the experimental group additionally used the Green IQ mobile app. The Eco Index was assessed using a 10-item instrument developed by the author on a five-point Likert scale, covering environmental awareness, attitudes toward the environment, and environmentally responsible behavior. The results of the study showed that the mean Eco Index for the entire sample increased from 2.53 (SD = 0.769) on the pre-test to 4.03 (SD = 0.727) on the post-test. Both groups demonstrated significant within-group improvement: in the experimental group, it increased from 2.55 to 4.43 (mean change = 1.88), t (28) = 13.10, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 2.42, while in the control group it increased from 2.52 to 3.65 (mean change = 1.13), t(30) = 5.35, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.960. A mixed-effects analysis of variance revealed a significant time-by-group interaction, F(1,58) = 8.39, p = 0.005, indicating greater improvement in the experimental group.

References

Primeminister.kz (2026). «Taza Kazakstan»: kak obshhenacional'naja iniciativa Prezidenta menjaet podhod k jekologii i blagoustrojstvu [“Taza Kazakhstan”: how the President’s nationwide initiative is changing the approach to ecology and urban improvement]. Retrieved from Primeminister oficial website: https://primeminister.kz/ru/news/taza-kazakstan-kak-obshchenacionalnaya-iniciativa-prezidenta-menyaet-podhod-k-ekologii-i-blagoustroystvu-31801

Sebastián-López, M., & de Miguel González, R. (2020). Mobile Learning for Sustainable Development and Environmental Teacher Education. Sustainability, 12, (22), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229757

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14, (3), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Hardianti, F., & Kumorotomo, F. W., & Setianto, W.A., & Yazid, T.P., & Handayani, B. (2025). Green Digital Literacy: Inclusive Policy Innovation for Children’s Environmental Awareness, E3S Web of Conferences, 671, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567102008

Fernando, A.R., & Tajan, G. (2024). Education for sustainable development (ESD) through participatory research (PR): A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144237

Murti, W., & Rohman, F., & Sari, M., & Ibrohim, I. (2025). Ecoliteracy competencies: a systematic literature review of domains, approaches, and impacts in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16658

UNESCO. (2022). Berlin declaration on education for sustainable development: Learn for our planet: Act for sustainability. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381228

Abiltayeva, A., & Dlimbetova, D., & Petrov, B. (2026). Systematic approach to the formation of environmental competencies of students. 3i-Intellect, Idea, Innovation, 2(4), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.52269/NTDG254224

Evagelou, A., & Kleftodimos, A. (2025). Development and Evaluation of a Mobile Augmented Reality Application for Environmental Education. Proceedings of the Extended Reality: International Conference Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 151-171) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97769-5_12

Papakostas, C., & Stergiou, S. (2026). Evaluating EcoHeroes: Gamified mobile learning for environmental education in primary school. Natural Sciences Education, 55 (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.70047

Chuan, C., & Seelig, M., & Tsai, W., & Tao, W. (2024). Eco-Warrior: A theory-based mobile app intervention for forming and sustaining pro-environmental habits. Mobile Media & Communication, 13 (1), 234-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579241271066

Cheng, S.-C., & Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, C.-H. (2019). From reflective observation to active learning: A mobile experiential learning approach for environmental science education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (5), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12845

Abiltayeva, A., & Dlimbetova, G., & Issakhanova, A., & Petrov, B. (2026). Limits of continuous environmental education in developing environmental competencies among students in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1803357

Garzón, J., & Burgos, D., & Kinshuk, & Tlili, A. (2025). Mobile learning significantly enhances student learning gains: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105415

Sung, Y., & Lee, H., & Yang, J., & Chang, K. (2019). The quality of experimental designs in mobile learning research: A systemic review and self-improvement tool, Educational Research Review, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.001

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53-64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007

Hajj-Hassan, M.,&Chaker, R.,& Cederqvist, A. (2024).Environmental Education: A Systematic Review on the Use of Digital Tools for Fostering Sustainability Awareness. Sustainability, 16(9), https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093733

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68

The Jamovi project. (2025). jamovi (Version 2.6) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org

Wong, S. Y., & Ng, K. H. (2026). The impact of a mobile plant identification app on knowledge gains and behavioral reflection in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2026.2631991

Duda, E., Anacka, H., Kowal, J., Nowakowska, I., Obracht-Prondzyńska, H., Geirbo, H. C., Radziszewski, K., Romanowska, M., Wyciszkiewicz, A., & Zawieska, J. (2023). Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour Through an Educational Mobile Application: Preliminary Insights from Early Adopters. International Journal of Pedagogy Innovation and New Technologies, 10(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9400

Fernández, P., & Ceacero-Moreno, M. (2021). Study of the Training of Environmentalists through Gamification as A University Course. Sustainability, 13(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042323

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Abiltayeva, A. ., Dlimbetova, G. ., Abenova, S. ., Petrov, B. ., & Torpichsheva , R. . (2026). EVALUATING A MOBILE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ ENVIRONMENTAL COMPETENCIES: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY. Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, 27(3), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.37943/MRCC6435

Issue

Section

Pedagogy