A BREAKPOINT MODEL FOR DATA VOLUME AND NETWORK CAPACITY IN INTERNET OF THINGS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37943/HLSA6233

Keywords:

Massive IoT, 5G measurements, 6G, IMT-2030, Big Data analytics, breakpoint analysis, mMTC, vertical farming, digital twin, Lambda architecture

Abstract

The migration from fifth generation (5G) to sixth generation (6G) mobile networks is driven by the Massive Internet of Things (IoT), which targets device densities of up to ten million units per square kilometer. Two scaling limits govern such systems: a data-volume limit, beyond which batch analytics must give way to distributed streaming, and a network-capacity limit, beyond which the radio access network can no longer carry the aggregate uplink. These limits have so far been treated independently, and no empirical anchor exists for Central Asia. This study makes three contributions. First, it derives a closed-form, dimensionless separation ratio that couples the two breakpoints through shared system parameters and determines which limit binds first. Second, the model is instantiated using 145 regulated 5G New Radio measurements from the commercial Tele2 network in Astana, Kazakhstan, across five load scenarios spanning 13 to 100,000 emulated devices. Third, the closed-form structure of the ratio suggests the splitting is a general trait of uplink-bound IoT domains, though this study empirically instantiates only the vertical-farming case. The instantiated model yields a separation ratio of about thirty-two, with breakpoints at twenty-eight nodes for network capacity and eight hundred eighty for data volume. The measured round-trip time of 124.8 milliseconds and the measured uplink of 0.19 megabits per second miss the International Mobile Telecommunications-2030 (IMT-2030) targets by factors of 1248 and about 5.3 × 10⁵, respectively. Because the network-capacity limit binds first, the analytics regime required for dense deployment is unreachable on 5G. For the measured single-operator deployment, 6G is a precondition rather than an enhancement; generalization to other operators and sites requires further measurement.

References

International Telecommunication Union. (2023). Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond (Recommendation ITU-R M.2160-0). ITU-R. https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-M.2160

Tataria, H., Shafi, M., Molisch, A. F., Dohler, M., Sjöland, H., & Tufvesson, F. (2021). 6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(7), 1166–1199. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2021.3061701

Sinha, A., Shrivastava, G., & Kumar, P. (2019). Architecting user-centric Internet of Things for smart agriculture. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 23, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2019.07.001

Maraveas, C., Piromalis, D., Arvanitis, K. G., Bartzanas, T., & Loukatos, D. (2022). Applications of IoT for optimized greenhouse environment and resources management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 198, 106993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106993

Akanbi, A., & Masinde, M. (2020). A distributed stream processing middleware framework for real-time analysis of heterogeneous data on big data platform: Case of environmental monitoring. Sensors, 20(11), 3166. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113166

Salameh, A. I., & El Tarhuni, M. (2022). From 5G to 6G — Challenges, technologies, and applications. Future Internet, 14(4), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14040117

Akpakwu, G. A., Silva, B. J., Hancke, G. P., & Abu-Mahfouz, A. M. (2018). A survey on 5G networks for the Internet of Things: Communication technologies and challenges. IEEE Access, 6, 3619–3647. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2779844

Saad, W., Bennis, M., & Chen, M. (2020). A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems. IEEE Network, 34(3), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.001.1900287

Davoudian, A., & Liu, M. (2020). Big data systems: A software engineering perspective. ACM Computing Surveys, 53(5), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408314

Demirezen, M. U., & Navruz, T. S. (2023). Performance analysis of Lambda Architecture-based big-data systems on air/ground surveillance application with ADS-B data. Sensors, 23(17), 7580. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177580

Armbrust, M., Das, T., Torres, J., Yavuz, B., Zhu, S., Xin, R., Ghodsi, A., Stoica, I., & Zaharia, M. (2018). Structured streaming: A declarative API for real-time applications in Apache Spark. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 601–613). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3190664

Zaharia, M., Xin, R. S., Wendell, P., Das, T., Armbrust, M., Dave, A., Meng, X., Rosen, J., Venkataraman, S., Franklin, M. J., Ghodsi, A., Gonzalez, J., Shenker, S., & Stoica, I. (2016). Apache Spark: A unified engine for big data processing. Communications of the ACM, 59(11), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/2934664

Raptis, T. P., & Passarella, A. (2023). A survey on networked data streaming with Apache Kafka. IEEE Access, 11, 85333–85350. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3303810

Khattach, O., Moussaoui, O., & Hassine, M. (2025). End-to-end architecture for real-time IoT analytics and predictive maintenance using stream processing and ML pipelines. Sensors, 25(9), 2945. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25092945

Marjani, M., Nasaruddin, F., Gani, A., Karim, A., Hashem, I. A. T., Siddiqa, A., & Yaqoob, I. (2017). Big IoT data analytics: Architecture, opportunities, and open research challenges. IEEE Access, 5, 5247–5261. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2689040

Narayanan, A., Ramadan, E., Mehta, R., Hu, X., Liu, Q., Fezeu, R. A. K., Dayalan, U. K., Verma, S., Ji, P., Li, T., Qian, F., & Zhang, Z.-L. (2020). Lumos5G: Mapping and predicting commercial mmWave 5G throughput. In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 176–193). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419394.3423629

Rischke, J., Sossalla, P., Salah, H., Fitzek, F. H. P., & Reisslein, M. (2021). 5G campus networks: A first measurement study. IEEE Access, 9, 121786–121803. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3108423

Hassan, N., Yau, K.-L. A., & Wu, C. (2019). Edge computing in 5G: A review. IEEE Access, 7, 127276–127289. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2938534

Saad, M. H. M., Hamdan, N. M., & Sarker, M. R. (2021). State of the art of urban smart vertical farming automation systems. Electronics, 10(12), 1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10121422

Bakirov, K., Tussupov, J., Tultabayeva, T., Makangali, K., Abdikerimova, G., & Yessenova, M. (2024). Advances in the design and optimization of smart irrigation systems for sustainable urban vertical farming. Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, 20, 76–90. https://doi.org/10.37943/20NNYR9391

Bakirov, K., Tussupov, J., Shoman, A., Shayea, I., Tussupov, A., Kudashov, Y., & Sabitova, Z. (2025). IoT-based monitoring and intelligent control for microgreens in vertical farming systems. Procedia Computer Science, 272, 601–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.10.254

Rathor, A. S., Choudhury, S., Sharma, A., Nautiyal, P., & Shah, G. (2024). Empowering vertical farming through IoT and AI-driven technologies: A comprehensive review. Heliyon, 10(15), e34998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34998

Boursianis, A. D., Papadopoulou, M. S., Diamantoulakis, P., Liopa-Tsakalidi, A., Barouchas, P., Salahas, G., Karagiannidis, G., Wan, S., & Goudos, S. K. (2020). Internet of Things and agricultural unmanned aerial vehicles in smart farming: A comprehensive review. Internet of Things, 18, 100187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100187

Yedilkhan, D., Kyzyrkanov, A., Amirgaliyev, B., Khaimuldin, N., Ayub, M. S., & Zhumadillayeva, A. (2025). Efficient area coverage strategies for high-altitude UAVs in smart city monitoring. Drones, 9(9), 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9090632

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Bakirov, K., Tussupov , J., Tokhmetov, A., Shayea, I., Tultabayeva, T., & Makangali, K. (2026). A BREAKPOINT MODEL FOR DATA VOLUME AND NETWORK CAPACITY IN INTERNET OF THINGS. Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, 26(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.37943/HLSA6233

Issue

Section

Information Technologies