DEEP LEARNING FOR LYMPH NODE DETECTION IN CT IMAGING: A BENCHMARKING STUDY OF OBJECT DETECTION FRAMEWORKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37943/SJEN9984Keywords:
CT imaging, deep learning, lymph node detection, object detection, 2.5D processingAbstract
Accurate detection of lymph nodes on computed tomography (CT) scans is essential for cancer staging and treatment planning, yet manual identification on CT is time-consuming and subject to considerable inter-observer variability, motivating the development of reliable automated methods. Automating this task remains challenging because many nodes are very small, contrast with surrounding tissue is frequently low, and target instances constitute only a minuscule fraction of all voxels, an extreme class-imbalance problem. In this study, we evaluate five state-of-the-art object detection architectures (Faster R-CNN, YOLOv8-m, MULAN, YOLOv11-m, and RT-DETR-L) under standardized training and evaluation protocols on two datasets with different anatomical compositions: a heterogeneous multi-region dataset (Ver1) and a mediastinal-focused dataset (Ver2). Both datasets were processed using a memory-efficient 2.5D pipeline that feeds three consecutive CT slices as input, capturing volumetric context while avoiding the computational cost of full 3D models. On Ver2, Faster R-CNN and MULAN achieved the highest mAP50 of 0.641, while RT-DETR-L led in recall (0.646) and F1-score (0.630). Every model improved its mAP50 on the anatomically focused dataset. Because the same shift appeared across five structurally different detectors, we attribute it to the detection task itself rather than to any particular architectural design. Paired testing on Ver2 showed that MULAN significantly outperformed both YOLO variants in mAP50, with Faster R-CNN following the same tendency. On Ver1, no pair of models differed significantly, so performance converges once anatomical diversity increases. Taken together, the comparison gives clinicians practical grounds for choosing between speed, precision, and sensitivity, and supplies reference baselines for later work on automated lymph node detection in CT.
References
Ji, H., Hu, C., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Ji, G., Ge, S., Wang, X., & Wang, M. (2023). Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: Molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 8, Article 367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01576-4
Terán, M. D., & Brock, M. V. (2014). Staging lymph node metastases from lung cancer in the mediastinum. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 6(3), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.12.18
Matsuda, S., Takeuchi, M., Kawakubo, H., & Kitagawa, Y. (2023). Lymph node metastatic patterns and the development of multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer. Diseases of the Esophagus, 36(4), Article doad006. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad006
Schwartz, L. H., Litière, S., de Vries, E. G. E., Ford, R., Gwyther, S., Mandrekar, S., Shankar, L., Bogaerts, J., Chen, A., Dancey, J., Hayes, W., Hodi, F. S., Hoekstra, O. S., Huang, E. P., Lin, N., Liu, Y., Therasse, P., Wolchok, J. D., & Seymour, L. (2016). RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee. European Journal of Cancer, 62, 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081
Sobocińska, M., Białecki, M., Sobociński, B., Martynowska, I., & Cieściński, J. (2022). The influence of contrast enhancement and experience of observers on the assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes in sarcoidosis patients. Polish Journal of Radiology, 87, e392–e396. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.118303
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016). You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 779–788). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.91
Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A., & Qiu, J. (2023). Ultralytics YOLOv8 [Computer software]. https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
Jocher, G., & Qiu, J. (2024). Ultralytics YOLO11 [Computer software]. https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017). Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39(6), 1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031
Zhao, Y., Lv, W., Xu, S., Wei, J., Wang, G., Dang, Q., Liu, Y., & Chen, J. (2024). DETRs beat YOLOs on real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 16965–16974). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01605
Yan, K., Tang, Y., Peng, Y., Sandfort, V., Bagheri, M., Lu, Z., & Summers, R. M. (2019). MULAN: Multitask universal lesion analysis network for joint lesion detection, tagging, and segmentation. In D. Shen, T. Liu, T. M. Peters, L. H. Staib, C. Essert, S. Zhou, P.-T. Yap, & A. Khan (Eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11769, pp. 194–202). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32226-7_22
Roth, H. R., Lu, L., Seff, A., Cherry, K. M., Hoffman, J., Wang, S., Liu, J., Turkbey, E., & Summers, R. M. (2014). A new 2.5D representation for lymph node detection using random sets of deep convolutional neural network observations. In P. Golland, N. Hata, C. Barillot, J. Hornegger, & R. Howe (Eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2014 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8673, pp. 520–527). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10404-1_65
Wang, Z., Sun, D., Zeng, X., Wu, R., & Wang, Y. (2024). Contextual embedding learning to enhance 2D networks for volumetric image segmentation. Expert Systems with Applications, 253, Article 124279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124279
Kumar, A., Jiang, H., Imran, M., Valdes, C., Leon, G., Kang, D., Nataraj, P., Zhou, Y., Weiss, M. D., & Shao, W. (2024). A flexible 2.5D medical image segmentation approach with in-slice and cross-slice attention. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 182, Article 109173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109173
Yang, X., Wu, L., Ye, W., Zhao, K., Wang, Y., Liu, W., Li, J., Li, H., Liu, Z., & Liang, C. (2020). Deep learning signature based on staging CT for preoperative prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Academic Radiology, 27(9), 1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.007
Wang, Y., Yang, C., Yang, Q., Zhong, R., Wang, K., & Shen, H. (2024). Diagnosis of cervical lymphoma using a YOLO-v7-based model with transfer learning. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 11073. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61955-x
Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., & Zagoruyko, S. (2020). End-to-end object detection with transformers. In A. Vedaldi, H. Bischof, T. Brox, & J.-M. Frahm (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2020 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12346, pp. 213–229). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13
Yu, Q., Wang, Y., Yan, K., Li, H., Guo, D., Zhang, L., Shen, N., Wang, Q., Ding, X., Lu, L., Ye, X., & Jin, D. (2024). Effective lymph nodes detection in CT scans using location debiased query selection and contrastive query representation in transformer. In A. Leonardis, E. Ricci, S. Roth, O. Russakovsky, T. Sattler, & G. Varol (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2024 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 15100, pp. 180–198). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72946-1_11
Roth, H. R., Lu, L., Seff, A., Cherry, K. M., Hoffman, J., Wang, S., Liu, J., Turkbey, E., & Summers, R. M. (2015). A new 2.5D representation for lymph node detection in CT [Data set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive. https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2015.AQIIDCNM
Idris, T., Somarouthu, S., Jacene, H., LaCasce, A., Ziegler, E., Pieper, S., Khajavi, R., Dorent, R., Pujol, S., Kikinis, R., & Harris, G. (2024). Mediastinal lymph node quantification (LNQ): Segmentation of heterogeneous CT data (Version 1) [Data set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive. https://doi.org/10.7937/QVAZ-JA09
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Articles are open access under the Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish a manuscript in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and transfer to the journal the right of first publication under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory link to the the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors have the right to conclude independent additional agreements that relate to the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic repository of the institution or publish as part of a monograph), providing the link to the first publication of the work in this journal.
- Other terms stated in the Copyright Agreement.