DEEP LEARNING FOR LYMPH NODE DETECTION IN CT IMAGING: A BENCHMARKING STUDY OF OBJECT DETECTION FRAMEWORKS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37943/SJEN9984

Keywords:

CT imaging, deep learning, lymph node detection, object detection, 2.5D processing

Abstract

Accurate detection of lymph nodes on computed tomography (CT) scans is essential for cancer staging and treatment planning, yet manual identification on CT is time-consuming and subject to considerable inter-observer variability, motivating the development of reliable automated methods. Automating this task remains challenging because many nodes are very small, contrast with surrounding tissue is frequently low, and target instances constitute only a minuscule fraction of all voxels, an extreme class-imbalance problem. In this study, we evaluate five state-of-the-art object detection architectures (Faster R-CNN, YOLOv8-m, MULAN, YOLOv11-m, and RT-DETR-L) under standardized training and evaluation protocols on two datasets with different anatomical compositions: a heterogeneous multi-region dataset (Ver1) and a mediastinal-focused dataset (Ver2). Both datasets were processed using a memory-efficient 2.5D pipeline that feeds three consecutive CT slices as input, capturing volumetric context while avoiding the computational cost of full 3D models. On Ver2, Faster R-CNN and MULAN achieved the highest mAP50 of 0.641, while RT-DETR-L led in recall (0.646) and F1-score (0.630). Every model improved its mAP50 on the anatomically focused dataset. Because the same shift appeared across five structurally different detectors, we attribute it to the detection task itself rather than to any particular architectural design. Paired testing on Ver2 showed that MULAN significantly outperformed both YOLO variants in mAP50, with Faster R-CNN following the same tendency. On Ver1, no pair of models differed significantly, so performance converges once anatomical diversity increases. Taken together, the comparison gives clinicians practical grounds for choosing between speed, precision, and sensitivity, and supplies reference baselines for later work on automated lymph node detection in CT.

Author Biographies

Beibit Abdikenov, Astana IT University

PhD, Director of Science and Innovation Center “Artificial Intelligence”

Zhaidar Kairat, Astana IT University

MSc student, Junior Researcher at Science and Innovation Center “Artificial Intelligence”

Temirlan Karibekov, Astana IT University

PhD,  Director of Science and Innovation Center “MedTech”

Tomiris Zhaksylyk, Astana IT University

PhD student, Researcher at Science and Innovation Center “Artificial Intelligence”

References

Ji, H., Hu, C., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Ji, G., Ge, S., Wang, X., & Wang, M. (2023). Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: Molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 8, Article 367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01576-4

Terán, M. D., & Brock, M. V. (2014). Staging lymph node metastases from lung cancer in the mediastinum. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 6(3), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.12.18

Matsuda, S., Takeuchi, M., Kawakubo, H., & Kitagawa, Y. (2023). Lymph node metastatic patterns and the development of multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer. Diseases of the Esophagus, 36(4), Article doad006. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad006

Schwartz, L. H., Litière, S., de Vries, E. G. E., Ford, R., Gwyther, S., Mandrekar, S., Shankar, L., Bogaerts, J., Chen, A., Dancey, J., Hayes, W., Hodi, F. S., Hoekstra, O. S., Huang, E. P., Lin, N., Liu, Y., Therasse, P., Wolchok, J. D., & Seymour, L. (2016). RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee. European Journal of Cancer, 62, 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081

Sobocińska, M., Białecki, M., Sobociński, B., Martynowska, I., & Cieściński, J. (2022). The influence of contrast enhancement and experience of observers on the assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes in sarcoidosis patients. Polish Journal of Radiology, 87, e392–e396. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.118303

Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016). You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 779–788). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.91

Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A., & Qiu, J. (2023). Ultralytics YOLOv8 [Computer software]. https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics

Jocher, G., & Qiu, J. (2024). Ultralytics YOLO11 [Computer software]. https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics

Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017). Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39(6), 1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031

Zhao, Y., Lv, W., Xu, S., Wei, J., Wang, G., Dang, Q., Liu, Y., & Chen, J. (2024). DETRs beat YOLOs on real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 16965–16974). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01605

Yan, K., Tang, Y., Peng, Y., Sandfort, V., Bagheri, M., Lu, Z., & Summers, R. M. (2019). MULAN: Multitask universal lesion analysis network for joint lesion detection, tagging, and segmentation. In D. Shen, T. Liu, T. M. Peters, L. H. Staib, C. Essert, S. Zhou, P.-T. Yap, & A. Khan (Eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11769, pp. 194–202). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32226-7_22

Roth, H. R., Lu, L., Seff, A., Cherry, K. M., Hoffman, J., Wang, S., Liu, J., Turkbey, E., & Summers, R. M. (2014). A new 2.5D representation for lymph node detection using random sets of deep convolutional neural network observations. In P. Golland, N. Hata, C. Barillot, J. Hornegger, & R. Howe (Eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2014 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8673, pp. 520–527). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10404-1_65

Wang, Z., Sun, D., Zeng, X., Wu, R., & Wang, Y. (2024). Contextual embedding learning to enhance 2D networks for volumetric image segmentation. Expert Systems with Applications, 253, Article 124279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124279

Kumar, A., Jiang, H., Imran, M., Valdes, C., Leon, G., Kang, D., Nataraj, P., Zhou, Y., Weiss, M. D., & Shao, W. (2024). A flexible 2.5D medical image segmentation approach with in-slice and cross-slice attention. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 182, Article 109173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109173

Yang, X., Wu, L., Ye, W., Zhao, K., Wang, Y., Liu, W., Li, J., Li, H., Liu, Z., & Liang, C. (2020). Deep learning signature based on staging CT for preoperative prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Academic Radiology, 27(9), 1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.007

Wang, Y., Yang, C., Yang, Q., Zhong, R., Wang, K., & Shen, H. (2024). Diagnosis of cervical lymphoma using a YOLO-v7-based model with transfer learning. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 11073. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61955-x

Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., & Zagoruyko, S. (2020). End-to-end object detection with transformers. In A. Vedaldi, H. Bischof, T. Brox, & J.-M. Frahm (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2020 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12346, pp. 213–229). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13

Yu, Q., Wang, Y., Yan, K., Li, H., Guo, D., Zhang, L., Shen, N., Wang, Q., Ding, X., Lu, L., Ye, X., & Jin, D. (2024). Effective lymph nodes detection in CT scans using location debiased query selection and contrastive query representation in transformer. In A. Leonardis, E. Ricci, S. Roth, O. Russakovsky, T. Sattler, & G. Varol (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2024 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 15100, pp. 180–198). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72946-1_11

Roth, H. R., Lu, L., Seff, A., Cherry, K. M., Hoffman, J., Wang, S., Liu, J., Turkbey, E., & Summers, R. M. (2015). A new 2.5D representation for lymph node detection in CT [Data set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive. https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2015.AQIIDCNM

Idris, T., Somarouthu, S., Jacene, H., LaCasce, A., Ziegler, E., Pieper, S., Khajavi, R., Dorent, R., Pujol, S., Kikinis, R., & Harris, G. (2024). Mediastinal lymph node quantification (LNQ): Segmentation of heterogeneous CT data (Version 1) [Data set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive. https://doi.org/10.7937/QVAZ-JA09

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Abdikenov, B., Kairat, Z., Karibekov, T. ., & Zhaksylyk, T. (2026). DEEP LEARNING FOR LYMPH NODE DETECTION IN CT IMAGING: A BENCHMARKING STUDY OF OBJECT DETECTION FRAMEWORKS . Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, 26(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.37943/SJEN9984

Issue

Section

Information Technologies