A DUAL-PATH MULTI-TASK FRAMEWORK FOR STRICT THREE-CURVE COBB ANGLE ESTIMATION IN IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37943/25XRRS8272Keywords:
Cobb angle estimation, scoliosis, deep learning, multi-task learning, dual-path fusion, medical imaging, curriculum learning, clinical decision supportAbstract
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis management depends on reproducible Cobb angle measurement across three clinically defined spinal regions: proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar. Although manual measurement remains the reference standard, it is observer-dependent and time-consuming, with inter-observer variability exceeding five degrees even among experienced readers. Most automated deep learning approaches target a single dominant curve or use unconstrained outputs, which limits their applicability to structured clinical workflows requiring strict regional assignment. This study presents a dual-path multi-task framework for simultaneous estimation of all three regional Cobb angles from posteroanterior spinal radiographs. The architecture integrates a ConvNeXt-Tiny encoder, vertebral localization heads, direct global angle regression via soft-argmax, and a geometric tilt-aggregation pathway. A learned per-region sigmoid gate fuses the global and geometric pathways, providing a fixed but optimized balance between statistical and anatomical estimation. The model was developed on 21,294 radiographs with leakage-controlled partitioning into training (N = 17,262), validation (N = 2,016), and test (N = 2,016) subsets. Training employed a two-stage curriculum with severity-aware sampling and hard replay for difficult cases. Three independent runs (seeds 42, 52, 62) were ensembled with test-time augmentation. On the primary held-out set (N = 2,015), the ensemble achieved a mean absolute error of 2.24 degrees (proximal thoracic 2.21, main thoracic 1.97, thoracolumbar/lumbar 2.54), with near-zero Bland-Altman bias (0.03 degrees), good-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (0.884–0.971), and 90.4% of predictions within 5 degrees. At the 40-degree treatment threshold, sensitivity was 0.934 and specificity was 0.994. These findings support the feasibility of strict three-curve automation for reader-in-the-loop clinical workflows.
References
Prestigiacomo, C., Hulsbosch, M. H. H. M., Bruls, V. E. J., & Nieuwenhuis, J. J. (2022). Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Cobb angle measurements in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. *Spine Deformity, 10*(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00398-0
Wang, L., Xie, C., Lin, Y., Zhou, H.-Y., Chen, K., Cheng, D., Kocev, D., Yap, C. H., Staring, M., & de Brujine, M. (2021). Evaluation and comparison of accurate automated spinal curvature estimation algorithms with spinal anterior-posterior X-ray images: The AASCE2019 challenge. *Medical Image Analysis, 72*, 102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102115
Jin, C., Wang, S., Yang, G., Li, E., & Liang, Z. (2022). A review of the methods on Cobb angle measurements for spinal curvature. *Sensors, 22*(9), 3258. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093258
d'Astorg, H., Faron, M., Jolivet, E., Folinais, D., & Bertheau, R. C. (2023). Comparison of Cobb angle measurements for scoliosis assessment using different imaging modalities: A systematic review. *EFORT Open Reviews, 8*(6), 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0032
Horng, M.-H., Kuok, C.-P., Fu, M.-J., Lin, C.-J., & Sun, Y.-N. (2019). Cobb angle measurement of spine from X-ray images using convolutional neural network. *Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2019*, 6357171. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6357171
Suri, A., Tang, S., Kargilis, D., Taratuta, E., Kneeland, B. J., Choi, G., Fritz, J., & Carrino, J. A. (2023). Conquering the Cobb angle: A deep learning algorithm for automated, hardware-invariant measurement of Cobb angle on radiographs in patients with scoliosis. *Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 5*(4), e220158. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.220158
Zou, L., Guo, L., Zhang, R., Ni, L., Chen, Z., He, X., & Wang, J. (2023). VLTENet: A deep-learning-based vertebra localization and tilt estimation network for automatic Cobb angle estimation. *IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 27*(6), 3002-3013. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2023.3258361
Wang, M. X., Kim, J. K., Choi, J.-W., Park, D., & Chang, M. C. (2024). Deep learning algorithm for automatically measuring Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. *European Spine Journal, 33*(11), 4155-4163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08024-5
Shi, C., Meng, N., Zhuang, Y., Cheung, J. P. Y., Zhao, M., Huang, H., Lin, Y., & Zhang, T. (2025). Accurate Cobb angle estimation via SVD-based curve detection and vertebral wedging quantification. *IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 29*(12), 8607-8614. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3600647
Chen, R., Xi, Y., Wang, T., Wang, A., Ma, Z., Liang, M., Yuan, S., Zang, L., & Fan, N. (2026). Advances in fusion level selection and surgical approaches for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on the Lenke classification system: A narrative review. *BMC Surgery, 26*(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03481-9
Zhu, Y., Yin, X., Chen, Z., Zhang, H., Xu, K., Zhang, J., & Wu, N. (2025). Deep learning in Cobb angle automated measurement on X-rays: A systematic review and meta-analysis. *Spine Deformity, 13*(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00954-4
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017). Mask R-CNN. *Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision*, 2961-2969. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.322
Zhang, Y., & Yang, Q. (2022). A survey on multi-task learning. *IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34*(12), 5586-5609. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3070203
Crawshaw, M. (2020). Multi-task learning with deep neural networks: A survey. *arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09796*. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.09796
Soviany, P., Ionescu, R. T., Rota, P., & Sebe, N. (2022). Curriculum learning: A survey. *International Journal of Computer Vision, 130*(6), 1526-1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-022-01611-x
Jimenez-Sanchez, A., Mateus, D., Kirchhoff, S., Navab, N., & Ballester, M. A. G. (2019). Medical-based deep curriculum learning for improved fracture classification. *Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention*, 694-702. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32226-7_77
Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.-Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., & Xie, S. (2022). A ConvNet for the 2020s. *Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition*, 11976-11986.
Loshchilov, I., & Hutter, F. (2019). Decoupled weight decay regularization. *Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations*.
Tarvainen, A., & Valpola, H. (2017). Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning results. *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30*.
Kendall, A., & Gal, Y. (2017). What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30*.
Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2016). Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. *Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning*, 1050-1059.
Tejani, A. S., Klontzas, M. E., Gatti, A. A., Mongan, J. T., & Kahn, C. E. (2024). Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): 2024 update. *Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 6*(4), e240300. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240300
Mongan, J., Moy, L., & Kahn, C. E. Jr. (2020). Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A guide for authors and reviewers. *Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 2*(2), e200029. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2020200029
Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A., & Blundell, C. (2017). Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30*.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Articles are open access under the Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish a manuscript in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and transfer to the journal the right of first publication under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory link to the the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors have the right to conclude independent additional agreements that relate to the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic repository of the institution or publish as part of a monograph), providing the link to the first publication of the work in this journal.
- Other terms stated in the Copyright Agreement.