EVENT-DRIVEN SERVERLESS ARCHITECTURE FOR SMART CITY E-PARTICIPATION PLATFORMS UNDER DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY CONSTRAINTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37943/GMPR7182

Keywords:

smart city, digital civic engagement , event-driven architecture , serverless computing , artificial intelligence , digital sovereignty , cloud computing

Abstract

With the digital transformation of urban governance and the development of the "smart city" concept, the role of digital civic participation platforms for engaging the public in decision-making processes is increasing. However, most existing e-participation systems are based on monolithic or containerized architectures, which limits their scalability, resilience to peak loads, and the ability to integrate intelligent analytics. This article proposes an event-driven, serverless architecture for a digital civic participation platform designed for use in urban ecosystems while adhering to digital sovereignty requirements. The architecture is based on a formal Citizen Participation Event Model (CPM), which views user actions as a stream of events processed in a distributed computing environment. The architecture natively integrates artificial intelligence modules for biometric user verification, behavioral anomaly detection, and text content analysis. Particular attention is paid to personal data protection and compliance with national information localization requirements using a hybrid data management model that separates personal data from anonymized analytical events. An experimental evaluation of the proposed solution was conducted under simulated conditions of typical urban civic engagement scenarios. The results demonstrate stable system operation under loads of up to 10,000 concurrent users, predictable latency dynamics, and a reduced total cost of ownership compared to a containerized architecture based on Kubernetes. It is concluded that event-driven serverless architectures can serve as the technological foundation for next-generation digital civic engagement platforms that combine scalability, intelligent data processing, and compliance with digital sovereignty requirements.

References

. Shin, B., Floch, J., Rask, M., Bæck, P., Edgar, C., Berditchevskaia, A., Mesure, P., & Branlat, M. (2024). A systematic analysis of digital tools for citizen participation. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101954

. United Nations Development Programme, & People Powered. (2025). Guide to digital participation platforms 2025. New York: UNDP. Retrieved from online website: https://www.undp.org/publications/guide-digital-participation-platforms-2025

. OECD. (2025). How innovation ecosystems foster citizen participation using emerging technologies in Portugal, Spain and the Netherlands. OECD Public Governance Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1787/2cb37a30-en

. Jaubin, J. (Ed.), Ahlers, D., Crombie, D., Gohari, S. K., Massink, R., Özdek, E., et al. (2020). Citizen engagement solution booklet. Smart Cities Information System (SCIS). Retrieved from online website: https://smart-cities-marketplace.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2021-02/scis_solution_booklet_citizen_engagement.pdf

. Eli, Jr., & Ferreira, B. M. (2022). Informative architectures and citizen participation: A comparative study between the digital platforms Decidim and Rousseau. Liinc em Revista, 18, e6058. https://doi.org/10.18617/LIINC.V18I2.6058.

. Cardullo, P., Ribera-Fumaz, R., & González Gil, P. (2023). The Decidim “soft infrastructure”: Democratic platforms and technological autonomy in Barcelona. Computational Culture, 9. Retrieved from online website: http://computationalculture.net/the-decidim-soft-infrastructure/

. Jungherr, A., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in deliberation: The AI penalty and the emergence of a new deliberative divide. Government Information Quarterly, 42(4), 102079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102079

. Tessler, M. H., et al. (2024). AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation. Science, 386. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq2852.

. Fontes, C., & Mahajan, S. (2025). AI strengthening democratic engagement. In Handbook of democracy in the era of AI. Edward Elgar.

. Zisengwe, M., & Stempeck, M. (2023). What you should know about digital participation & AI. People Powered. Retrieved from online website: https://www.peoplepowered.org/news-content/what-governments-should-know-about-digital-participation-amp-ai

. Baldini, I. et al. (2017). Serverless Computing: Current Trends and Open Problems. In: Chaudhary, S., Somani, G., Buyya, R. (eds) Research Advances in Cloud Computing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5026-8_1

. Pogiatzis, A., & Samakovitis, G. (2021). An event-driven serverless ETL pipeline on AWS. Applied Sciences, 11(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010191

. Mohanagandhi, V., & Ramalingam, G. (2024). Event-driven serverless architecture on AWS. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.14.10.2024.p15445

. Thorpe, K. (2022). Understanding the serverless framework and event-driven architecture. Proofpoint Engineering Blog. Retrieved from online website: https://www.proofpoint.com/uk/blog/engineering-insights/understanding-serverless-framework-and-event-driven-architecture

. Amazon Web Services. (2025). Optimizing serverless architecture using Lambda provisioned concurrency. Retrieved from online website: https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/smartsheet-lambda-case-study/

. Bokolo, A. J. (2025). Implementing digital sovereignty to accelerate smarter mobility solutions. Smart Cities, 8(4), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8040106

. Musoni, M., Karkare, P., Teevan, C., & Domingo, E. (2023). Global approaches to digital sovereignty. ECDPM Discussion Paper No. 344. Retrieved from online website: https://ecdpm.org/application/files/7816/8485/0476/Global-approaches-digital-sovereignty-competing-definitions-contrasting-policy-ECDPM-Discussion-Paper-344-2023.pdf

. Think-IT Engineering Team. (2024). Data Sovereignty Through Data Spaces. Retrieved from online website: https://think-it.io/insights/data-sovereignty

. Stewart, I. (2025). The role of data sovereignty in global compliance. Exasol. Retrieved from online website: https://www.exasol.com/blog/data-sovereignty-global-compliance/

. European Court of Auditors. (2023). Smart cities Tangible solutions, but fragmentation challenges their wider adoption. Retrieved from online website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/ECAPublications/SR-2023-24/SR-2023-24_EN.pdf

. ISO/IEC. (2022). Cloud computing — Distributed application architecture (ISO/IEC 35.210).

. Kitchin, R. (2021). Data-driven urbanism and smart city governance. Urban Studies, 58(1), 1–18. Retrieved from online website: https://kitchin.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/DATC-chapter-4-2017.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Kassymova, A., Uskenbayeva , R. ., Young , I. C., Smakhanova, A. ., & Anartayeva, A. . (2026). EVENT-DRIVEN SERVERLESS ARCHITECTURE FOR SMART CITY E-PARTICIPATION PLATFORMS UNDER DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY CONSTRAINTS . Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, 26(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.37943/GMPR7182

Issue

Section

Information Technologies